I started writing about the pigeon article we read with the intention of having a point, but then it turned into a story from my youth (posted below). So I wanted to add one more post with a few thoughts on pigeons and the urban environment.
I write this as I sit in an airport, watching people scurry to and from their own homing pigeons – large metal birds - and this has made me think about environment and home. I’m thinking – in particular – about pigeons as metaphor for human adaptability and movement.
The article by Boris Palameta says of the pigeon that it’s as if “evolution has prepared them especially for human intervention.” As humans have reconfigured nature into urban centers, pigeons have thrived due to an abundance of food in the city, have thrived due to the warmth of the city, and have survived due to their development of a keen sense of direction and landmark. As the city has been built to convenience the needs of the human, it has also given the pigeon a lifestyle of convenience.
And the problems with pigeon overpopulation mirror human problems both directly and metaphorically. The spread of disease associated with overpopulation is not dissimilar to the passage of illness between humans in high-density areas. Also, the problem of pigeon overeating has parallels to health problems and early deaths in humans who, in these times, are overeating convenience foods that threaten their health. Palameta writes that the urban pigeon is smart enough to seek the path of least resistance to food (i.e. going to a person who feeds the pigeon on a regular basis for meals). Humans, opting out of home-cooked meals in favor of fast foods, are harming themselves in much the same way. Humans seek a path of least resistance that may cause long-term harm.
What interests me most, though, is the idea of the pigeon (the passenger pigeon in particular) as a metaphor for humans in terms of home and environment. As I sit in the airport, I am linking “species” of humans to their airline gates. For instance, at the gate for Duluth, Minnesota, I see flannel-attired old men and women in Green Bay Packer sweatshirts. For the most part, this flock is blue collar and wears a layer of warmth directly referring to the cold, northern climate it originates from. At the gate for NY-JFK, I see some business-attired men, some young hipster-looking adults, and a thin, beautiful woman wearing a wisp of a dress that reeks of money. I see money at this gate but I also see diversity (monetary and cultural). This group is not made up entirely of native New Yorkers; like pigeons, they have carved New York out as a home. As pigeon-people, they nest in the city but they “home” to their roots – to Kansas or India or Utica or where ever they originally migrated from. And…like the pigeons of the city who have been well-fed on account of their attractiveness, I can see the New Yorkers who may have been well-fed financially in part due to their fine feathers…
And all of these people in the airport – like pigeons – have survived NOT by following the light out of the tunnel, but by memorizing the intricacies of their environments: the clothing, the culture, the food, the social scene…
I have many more thoughts on this, but they aren’t particularly organized. And I’m writing under a time constraint. In closing, I’m thinking about how we (as humans) can benefit by comparing our human selves to animals rather than to anthropomorphize the animal. The animal can be the starting point in the thought experiment, not the human. Let’s see how we are like pigeons or rats or monkeys rather than fitting them into our human-based understanding of the world.